{"id":130,"date":"2011-11-07T01:28:09","date_gmt":"2011-11-07T01:28:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jackspeer.net\/wordpress\/?p=130"},"modified":"2011-11-29T05:00:32","modified_gmt":"2011-11-29T05:00:32","slug":"slate-hows-the-multi-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/?p=130","title":{"rendered":"Slate-How&#8217;s My Multi-Media? #5"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In my previous post I talked about the fact that I think<strong><em> Slate<\/em><\/strong> does a fair job of presenting multimedia content. In that example I referenced audio. I&#8217;ve also said how much I love the photography and that opinion hasn&#8217;t changed. I still adore the <a href=\"http:\/\/todayspictures.slate.com\/20111019\/\"><em>photo galleries<\/em><\/a> as much as ever. But I had also praised some of the video on the <em><strong>Slate.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>So imagine my surprise when I found some pretty terrible video. In &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/video\/conversations_with_slate\/2011\/10\/jennifer_egan_s_conversation_with_jacob_weisberg_part_2.html\"><em>Jennifer Egan:The Lure of the Shadow Self<\/em><\/a>&#8221; I expected to see a slick expertly produced video. Let me know what you think, but my version jumped all over the place. It looked like it was shot on a cellphone. My question is why? This is a professional publication that presumably has a budget, so why the crummy hand held video? I also don&#8217;t like <em><strong>Slate&#8217;s<\/strong><\/em> idea of posting the ads that sponsor its video segments at the beginning of the segment and again at the end. Isn&#8217;t one or the other sufficient? Apparently not. I think I want my web video to look better. Jerky 1081i video is still jerky 1080i video.<\/p>\n<p>I thought I would next jump to something like &#8220;<em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slatev.com\/video\/dear-prudence-charitable-conundrum\/\">Dear Prudence<\/a> <\/em>,&#8221; which I have also written about before on this site. The column routinely utilizes animation alongside actual people and I was hoping it would be far more watchable. And viola! It actually was. The interspersed live action and animation in a short-format works quite well. This left me more confused than ever over why the other video was so bad? Beats me.<\/p>\n<p>Other features <strong><em>Slate<\/em><\/strong> has include pod-casts, which are fine, and of course the &#8221; Doonesbury&#8221; cartoons which I also like. So the verdict?&#8230;Like so much else produced on this site it&#8217;s mixed, leaving the reader confused about why one video looks great and another terrible. It continues to be the lack of consistency that is the most maddening thing about this publication.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In my previous post I talked about the fact that I think Slate does a fair job of presenting multimedia content. In that example I referenced audio. I&#8217;ve also said how much I love the photography and that opinion hasn&#8217;t &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/?p=130\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"gallery","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pfbyK0-26","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=130"}],"version-history":[{"count":24,"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":133,"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130\/revisions\/133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jackspeer.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}